← InsightsIGCP | CAPITAL PARTNERS
    Succession

    Business closure or sale? What pays off for owners, and when

    IGCP Capital Partners · Published · Updated

    Cover image for article: Business closure or sale? What pays off for owners, and when

    Owners without a successor face a choice: sell or close the business down. A sale preserves jobs and almost always yields more than the sum of the parts — closure is often the most expensive solution.

    Anyone without a within-family successor faces a fundamental decision: sell the company or close the business. A sale preserves jobs, customer relationships and goodwill — and for a business with independent earning power it generally yields more than the sum of the individual parts realised. Business closure is often the most expensive solution.

    Nevertheless many owners decide in favour of closure. Mostly not because it would be cheaper, but because they thought about the alternative too late. How a sale as an alternative to shutdown works and how we support it can be read on the service page.

    What yields more: business closure or sale?

    A sale yields more as soon as the company has something transferable — customers, employees, independent earning power — because the buyer pays goodwill for it, which is lost without replacement on closure. For tax purposes, by contrast, closure offers no advantage: in Germany the closure of a trade business is treated as a disposal (§ 16 Abs. 3 EStG), in Austria the closure gain likewise counts among the gains on disposal (§ 24 Abs. 1 EStG 1988).

    How large the topic is, the current figures show:

    IndicatorValueSource, status
    Mittelstand companies in Germany that want to exit the market without a succession arrangement by end of 2026around 243,000KfW Research, Nachfolge-Monitoring Mittelstand 2025, 09.01.2026
    Mittelstand companies considering a business closure after the owner generation withdraws25 %KfW Research, 09.01.2026
    Reasons of those planning shutdown: retirement age / no interest in the family / bureaucracy52 % / 47 % / 42 %KfW Research, 09.01.2026
    Closures of larger businesses in Germany 2025around 99,900 (+0.8 %)Destatis, Pressemitteilung Nr. 074, 06.03.2026
    IHK counselling of previous owners 2024 vs. those interested in a takeoveralmost 10,000 vs. a good 4,000DIHK-Report Unternehmensnachfolge 2025, July 2025
    Employer businesses in Austria facing a potential handover by 2035around 56,600, with close to 780,000 employeesKMU Forschung Austria, cited by WKO, 17.10.2026

    Sources: KfW Research, Fokus Volkswirtschaft Nr. 526; Destatis, Pressemitteilung Nr. 074 of 6 March 2026; DIHK-Report Unternehmensnachfolge 2025; WKO, record year for business successions; all retrieved on 28.09.2026; KMU Forschung Austria, cited by WKO, updated 17.10.2026, retrieved on 06.11.2026.

    Noteworthy: according to KfW, 42 percent of those planning shutdown cite bureaucracy as a reason, 47 percent lack of interest in the family. Neither argues against a sale to outsiders — they argue for preparing it in good time.

    What does business closure mean?

    In a business closure the company is wound up: machinery and inventory are sold, receivables collected, liabilities settled, contracts terminated. What is left goes to the owner. The business ceases to exist — and with it the customer base that has been built up and the jobs.

    For a GmbH the winding-up is called liquidation, and it is tied to deadlines: in Germany the assets may be distributed only when debts have been repaid or secured and one year has passed since the creditor call (blocking year, § 73 Abs. 1 GmbHG). In Austria this period is three months from publication of the creditor call (§ 91 Abs. 3 GmbHG). Liquidators who breach these rules are liable for the amounts distributed (§ 73 Abs. 3 GmbHG).

    Those who examine leasing instead of closure will find the tax and economic consequences in Business leasing.

    Facing this situation yourself? IGCP advises owners independently — the initial conversation is free of charge, without obligation and strictly confidential.

    Request a free initial consultation →

    Why does a sale usually yield more?

    Because a running company is worth more than its individual parts. A buyer pays not only for machinery, but for the established business, the customers, the brand and the earning power — the so-called goodwill. It is precisely this value that is lost on closure. Valuers therefore distinguish between going-concern value and liquidation value; under the valuation standard IDW S 1, the liquidation value generally forms the lower limit. Those who know both figures decide on numbers rather than on feeling — a valuation that sets going-concern value against liquidation value is the basis for this.

    CriterionSaleBusiness closure
    ProceedsEarnings value incl. goodwillonly realisation of the individual parts, less winding-up costs
    TaxCapital gain on disposal, with allowance and reduced rateClosure gain, the same reliefs
    Jobspass to the buyer on transfer of undertakingend; with a works council in companies with 21 or more eligible employees, information and social plan (§§ 111, 112 BetrVG)
    Customer basepasses to the buyerdissolves
    Effortstructured processwinding-up, for the GmbH with blocking period

    What makes up the value of a company is shown in What is my company worth?.

    What applies for tax on closure and sale

    Closure and sale are treated largely alike for tax purposes. In Germany, on closure the sale prices of the assets sold are used; what is not sold but taken into private assets is valued at the fair value (§ 16 Abs. 3 EStG). From age 55 there is, once in a lifetime, an allowance of EUR 45,000, which phases out from EUR 136,000 of gain (§ 16 Abs. 4 EStG), and, on application, a reduced tax rate of 56 percent of the average tax rate (§ 34 Abs. 3 EStG).

    In Austria, an allowance of EUR 7,300 applies and — from age 60 on ceasing gainful activity — half-rate taxation. For buildings that move into private assets on closure, there is a special rule on application (§ 24 Abs. 6 EStG 1988). The details are explained by Business succession and tax.

    The consequence: tax is no argument for closure. Those who have to tax hidden reserves anyway should at least sell the goodwill along with it.

    When is closure still realistic?

    When there is nothing transferable. A business that depends entirely on the person of the owner — without a transferable customer base, without employees, without independent earning power — can hardly be sold. Also in the case of persistent losses without a restructuring prospect, an orderly closure can be the cleaner route. If the company is over-indebted, separate rules apply: Selling a GmbH with debts.

    Patterns from practice: when closure turns into a sale after all

    Two constellations recur. They are described here without reference to individual mandates.

    1. The owner regards his business as unsellable. A service provider with a dozen employees and long-standing maintenance contracts plans to close because no child wants to take over. In fact the maintenance contracts are exactly the transferable asset that a regional competitor is looking for. Remedy: before the closure resolution, examine which parts have value for whom — customer contracts, team, site.

    2. The partial sale before closure. A business is not sellable as a whole, but individual divisions or the customer base are. Those who first sell these parts and only then wind up the rest achieve more than with a pure liquidation. Remedy: value parts individually and fix the order of sale and winding-up.

    The common error of thinking

    Many examine a sale only when health or age leave no choice. Then often only closure is still possible, because there is no time for an orderly sale. According to the DIHK, 38 percent of previous owners are not well prepared for succession at the time of IHK counselling, because they deal with it too late. Those who start early keep both routes open. Which options exist is shown by Succession solutions and Succession without family; for owners in Germany it is worthwhile to examine the succession options in Germany before shutdown.

    Frequently asked questions

    Is a sale always better than business closure?

    Almost always, if there is a transferable business. The sale realises the goodwill and preserves jobs. For tax purposes closure offers no advantage, because in Germany and Austria it is treated like a disposal. Only if nothing transferable exists can closure be the realistic route.

    What is the difference between business closure and liquidation?

    The terms overlap. Business closure (Betriebsaufgabe) is the tax term for the cessation of a business, liquidation the company-law term for the winding-up of a company such as the GmbH — with creditor call and a blocking period of one year in Germany and three months in Austria.

    How many companies in Germany are planning a shutdown?

    According to the KfW Succession Monitor of January 2026, around 243,000 mid-sized companies want to exit the market by the end of 2026 without a succession arrangement; one in four considers a business closure after the owner generation withdraws.

    Do I at least get the material value on closure?

    As a rule only the realisation proceeds of the individual parts less the winding-up costs. The goodwill — for high-earning businesses a large part of the company value — remains unused.

    When should I make the decision?

    As early as possible. The more time remains, the more likely a sale rather than a closure is possible. What a sale could realistically yield can be clarified as a first step by roughly calculating the going-concern value. What passes in a sale of the business instead of the shares is shown by Selling a business.

    NachfolgeBetriebsaufgabeUnternehmensverkaufLiquidation

    Related services

    More insights