Last updated:
Selling a shareholding is something different from selling a company. You are not divesting a business but a position within a circle of shareholders — with all the rights attached to it, and all the restrictions the articles of association impose.
That does not make the matter smaller, only different. Whoever holds the majority sells control. Whoever holds a minority sells an expectation. Both can be sold — on very different terms.
The value of a stake does not follow from the percentage alone, but from what the buyer can do with it.
Whoever gives up more than 50 % transfers control over day-to-day decisions. The price is based on the proportionate company value, frequently with a premium for control. For the buyer this is the standard case of a company acquisition — the process largely follows the one described under selling your company.
Below 50 % it becomes more complicated. The buyer acquires a position without decision-making power: they can neither appoint the management nor force distributions nor influence the timing of a later sale. The price therefore regularly sits below the arithmetic share of the company value.
What matters are the rights that are sold along with the stake. A tag-along right when the majority exits, a veto on fundamental transactions, a binding distribution mechanism or a seat on the advisory board change the value of a minority considerably. Where these rights are missing, what is being sold is a hope.
Before buyers or price are discussed, it has to be clarified whether — and to whom — you are allowed to sell at all.
Most GmbH articles make the transfer of shares subject to the consent of the shareholders’ meeting. Without that consent the transfer is void. Whoever looks for a buyer before knowing where consent stands is negotiating over something they may not be able to deliver.
Co-shareholders frequently hold a right of first refusal: they may step in on the terms negotiated with a third party. That is not an obstacle, but it changes the sequence — the external party knows that its offer serves as a price anchor for others and approaches accordingly cautiously.
Some articles prescribe a valuation method for a departing shareholder — or even a fixed compensation formula — at times well below market value. This clause can determine the entire economic framework. It has to be read before anything else happens.
In most cases the most obvious and fastest route. They know the company, need no due diligence and have their own interest in not admitting a stranger to the circle. The drawback: without an alternative, they set the price. A credible external party fundamentally changes that negotiation.
In Germany a GmbH may acquire its own shares under the conditions of § 33 GmbHG: the contribution must be fully paid in and the price paid out of free assets without touching the share capital. In Austria the acquisition of its own shares by a GmbH is prohibited in principle under § 81 GmbHG; there the route runs via the co-shareholders or — where the articles provide for it — via redemption of the share against compensation. Both are matters for the specialist advisers, but economically often the most elegant solution where liquidity is available in the company.
Private equity firms and family offices acquire minorities when a sale of the whole company is foreseeable, or when the running distribution carries the return. For them, the design of the shareholders’ agreement matters more than the price — set out in detail in the shareholders’ agreement when an investor comes on board.
Sometimes selling a shareholding is not driven by the wish to leave but by the need for capital. Then bringing in an investor is the more suitable route — described under finding an investor.
If you are thinking through the sale of your shareholding, we will talk with you confidentially and without obligation.